1. Aunt Dorothy and Walter were Jewish - A JNF 'Blue Box' was always on their kitchen counter, Hadassah was a family tradition, a month before she died she even told the notary that she was Jewish, yet NO Jewish charities are on the Adumdum List.  Nor were any of Walter's favorite U.S. Navy charities. (See supporting evidence - Jewish.)
2. Aunt Dorothy was Well-Organized and Relied on her Attorney - She was modestly wealthy and would not have composed an amendment to her trust without consulting her attorney. She followed instructions accurately.  Had she even consulted her attorney or read any public instructions, she would have used the term amendment to the Dorothy Horwitz Family Trust. It is impossible that she would have subjected those she loved to the ambiguity of a crude 'adumdum'.  (See supporting evidence - Estate Attorney.)
3. Aunt Dorothy Always Included At a Minimun the Heading "Family Trust" - All of her notes, files, letters and summaries related to the 2012 Dorothy Horwitz Family Trust included at a minimum the heading "Family Trust".  All of her computer generated documents used the same typeface, were paragraphed and neatly formated.  The signed "adumdum' used a foreign typeface, had no paragraphs seperating thoughts, contained legal payment protocol only trustee Louie would have inserted, and NEVER MENTIONS The Dorothy Horwitz Family Trust. It is impossible that she would have three different headings in a single file at a time when her contemporary documents were properly headed and formated. (See supporting evidence - Family Trust Heading)
4. Aunt Dorothy Compiled A Summary of Family Trust Stocks The Same Week - The same week, six months prior to her death, during which Dororthy allegedly composed the Adumdum and new Charities List in a single file on her computer,(See supporting evidence.).  Her summary does not comport with the purported Adumdum documents. It is impossible that she composed the Adumdum in a single file at a time when her contemporary documents were properly headed and formated. (See supporting evidence - Stock Summary.)   
5.  Aunt Dorothy Was Unable to Print or Write Legibly After October 25, 2013. On October 31, 2013, Dorothy attempted to print in her checkbook register and write a check.  She was unsuccessful, and the check register shows she tried twice and gave up.  After that all the entries are made by her fiduciary Rose Aparicio.  On October 18, 2013, when she allegedly signed the jurat to the Adumdum, the notary deposes under oath that she was unable to obtain a legible thumbprint because "Dorothy's hand was shaking".  It is impossible that she signed an uncharacteristic, smooth and flowing signature at the same time.  (See supporting evidence - Checkbook Register.)
6.  Forsenic Document Expert Demonstrates Forgery of Charities Page.  (See FDE Stephen Green Letter & Report)
7.   
8. Phantom Judge - Daniel Murphy Appears & Disappears - An associated of Joe Ling
9. Coerced or Corrupt: Memorandum in Support of a New Trial September, 2016
10. A Corrupt Truncated Trial & Decision August 3, 2016 by Maria Stratton, probate judge
11. Elder Financial Abuse - the Gunderson Case - Los Angeles Times
12. Cantor Pierre Pinchik - Walter & Dorothy Horwitz's First Cousin 1R

TRUSTEE LOUIE & LING - DEPRAVITY & CRIMINALITY

1. Criminally Drafted Adumdum with Ling and Aparicio
2. Perjury
3. Concealed and Destroy Critical Evidence and Documents
4. Breach of Duty of Loyalty to Family Trust Beneficiaries
5. Breach of Duty of Impartiality in Inter-Beneficiary Dispute
6. Summary of the Case of Forgery, Fraud and Grand Larceny

On my instructions, attorney Joel Bryant of San Diego filed a petition to invalidate the fraudulent Adumdum.  The only "objector" was Hoover Louie, the successor-trustee of the Dorothy Horwitz Family Trust.  As the sole trustee, Louie was bound by California Probate Law §16003 which is "black letter" law as unanimously recognized in Bowles v. Superior Court (1955)44 C2d 574, "no trustee can properly act for only some of the beneficiaries--he must represent all of them or he cannot properly represent any of them."

When the Court, Maria Stratton presiding, denied the petition, attorney Bryant advised that it was "political" and would likely cost $150,000 to continue.  This was beyond our disposable resources.  As there are no extenuating circumstances warranting a departure from §16003, it was prima facie evidence of the bias and corruption of the Court.

Subsequent investigations discovered that Ms. Stratton had been associated with McManus Cartel and subscribed to their mandate, hostile to the Solomon and Horwitz families.  I filed motions to recuse, to produce the contents of the safe deposit boxes, and access to the Horwitz home were denied.  At the trial hearing in June, 2016, neither the successor-trustee Louie, nor the fiduciary Aparicio appeared to authenticate the fraudulent Adumdum.   The Respondent did not present any witnesses and moved for a judgment.

I was the only witness with a personal relationship with my Aunt Dorothy and clearly showed that my Aunt Dorothy was well-organized, her documents and letters had a formal structure, and that she relied on professionals for her legal affairs.  With over a million dollars in brokerage, she would not have concerned with how trustee Louie was paid, or that the Horwitz home was sold by Rose Aparicio’s real estate agent.  Simply, she would NEVER attempt to draft an ‘adumdum’ without advice of her local estate attorney. 

Dorothy was also unable to write legibly on November 18, 2013.  She stopped her entries in her checkbook on October 31, 2013, and thereafter Rose Aparicio make the entries, including a first check to herself.   Respondent Louie asserted that Dorothy executed the Adumdum in front of two witnesses, notary Doris Tucker and Garden Crest manager Orit Shapiro.   Doris Tucker did not sign any Adumdum or related affidavit or jurat on November 18, 2013.  Orit Shapiro sent the Respondent’s counsel Margaret Morrow and Joseph Mirkovich, law partners of brother-in-law a sworn declaration that she did NOT witness the execution of the Adumdum – a declaration which was concealed from the Petitioner.

Also conclusive is the fact that under California Probate Law §21380, "a donative transfer to a beneficiary who drafted the instrument" is legally fraudulent and invalid unless the donor was advised by an independent attorney.  Here, the Respondent counsel narrative and information to the Court was that Adumdum beneficiary Aparicio had drafted and transcribed the Adumdum and presented it to successor-trustee Louie. The detailed review of the evidence clearly and conclusively shows that the Adumdum was the fraudulent creation of Louie, Ling and Aparicio.

Most conclusive is the fact that despite the admission that Dorothy was Jewish, a fact noted in the deposition of every party, that she adored my Jewish Uncle Walter, a U.S. Navy WWII veteran, and that a Cantor Pierre Pinchik record was among their collection, NO JEWISH OR U.S. NAVY CHARITIES WERE LISTED.

An honest and unbiased court would have denied the motion and invalidated the Adumdum, forcing the Respondent to controvert the evidence and my statements.  Maria Stratton, having ex-parte contact with and historic involvement with the McManus cartel, chose to grant the motion at the cartel's request.  A Motion for a New Trial was filed, which Maria Stratton avoided, forcing the Respondent's counsel Ling and Mirkovich to prevail on Long Beach business associate, Daniel Murphy, now a LASC Judge to deny the motion in open court.  When they realized that I had discovered their relationship, Daniel Murphy and Maria Stratton conspired to alter the proceedings in the official docket to indicate that she denied the Motion.